NVR Logo
U.S. politicians not ready for the future
Monday, November 13, 2006
Save and Share Share
This has been a banner year for political scandal, though it is evident we’ve just exposed a small part of the sleazy iceberg masquerading as politics in Washington, D.C.

We began with the Abramoff lobby scandal and then slid quickly down into the cesspool with a cast of characters that should be relegated to the rogue’s gallery on the post office wall, like Scooter Libby, Duke Cunningham, Robert Ney, Mark Foley. A case can be made that these are only the few dumb/unlucky enough to get caught!
In 1797, George Washington said “few men have the virtue to withstand the highest bidder” and I suspect that will always be true. But after a year like 2006, rational thought led me to believe this was the year we could replace typical more-of-same candidates with politicians with fresh ideas worthy of our votes. Virtue aside, I looked around for another instrument to gauge whether a candidate should represent me in D.C. and settled on stupidity.

Don’t get me wrong, as I am not trying to be funny. But there are certain problems of such enormity that unless they are approached intelligently, they could become crises capable of ending life as we know it.
These problems are known by both mainstream parties and their candidates. They then refuse to see the obvious and do what’s necessary to fix them.

Health care is an example. Any industry that rewards all the participants for raising rates is a recipe for disaster. In health care, why would physicians, drug companies and the medical support community not continue to raise rates when they pass them on to consumers through the insurance companies? And why would the insurance industry have a problem with this as long as they can raise premiums? There is no reason to cap costs when everyone involved makes more money.
Our current system works as long as people can shift their health care costs over to company-provided insurance policies. Fewer and fewer people can afford private policies anymore. With unions becoming impotent dinosaurs and companies paying more attention to the bottom line and their stockholders than their employees, fewer are offering their workers insurance.

Crunch the numbers and it is obvious our system is not working. Within our lifetimes, only the wealthy will be able to afford health care. A single payer system bordering on socialism is the only way out of this mess ,and any candidate not able to see this is not bright enough to be representing me.

Another problem is Iraq, Peak Oil and the future of the dollar. These three interwoven problems threaten America’s economic future like nothing else.

We have to ask ourselves if the invasion of Iraq was the first currency war. Was it for oil or against the Euro? And will Peak Oil become the death knell for the American century and our industrial civilization?

The notion that Iraq was invaded to prevent the development of weapons of mass destruction, combat terrorism, or even liberate a country from a violent dictator has long been discredited. For our government to continue this line of bull discredits us in the eyes of the world.

The only rationale for intervening in Iraq was for control of the oil fields and the means by which oil is traded in global markets. To arrive at this is to look at and understand the obvious.

The crucial shift in U.S. monetary policy away from the gold standard to becoming the monopoly currency for worldwide oil sales effectively enabled us to dominate world trade. It also empowered multinational corporations to a level of financial and political power greater than most nations. To upset this will cause such severe worldwide financial calamity that we’ll look at the Great Depression as the good old days.

Throw Peak Oil into the mix and you get the picture. What we need to do is begin an honest dialogue: The war has been nothing more than a resource and oil currency war. Only then will we be able to face, instead of postpone, the inevitable catastrophic financial and energy meltdown that may well trigger the end of the world as we know it.

Anyone who has not been able to see this has no right representing me in Washington, or anywhere, for that matter. Then that’s it — you’re too stupid to hold office — and outta here!

Without an immediate change in governance, what has become known as the American century, the American Experiment, the American Miracle, will end. For us to have any chance to avoid this, there has to be honesty from the top down, so decisions can be made from the grass roots up. Unfortunately, this will not happen unless we demand that our leaders face up to today’s problems honestly and with intelligence.

Don’t count on it this year.

(Lydecker lives in Napa.)
16 comment(s)

PHWYLIE wrote on Nov 13, 2006 7:29 AM:

" One must wonder what kind of discussion transpires in the ethics (sic) committees? "

Prissy Patriot wrote on Nov 13, 2006 10:30 AM:

" Good article and how true! "

Kevin wrote on Nov 13, 2006 1:14 PM:

" If losing control of the oil market would result in so much world wide mayhem, then I guess the war in Iraq is a good thing? As far as health care costs, Jim appears to correctly identify the problem (lack of market forces) but misses the obvious solution: introduce market forces back into the equation. Make people pay for health care the same we do for cars, houses and everything else we buy. "

comentator wrote on Nov 13, 2006 2:20 PM:

" Spoken like a man with a government job. "

Rocco wrote on Nov 13, 2006 2:56 PM:

" All this passion, and the only solutions offered are finding less stupid officials and/or socialism? Umm "

mookie wrote on Nov 14, 2006 6:37 AM:

" and yet the vice president recently said on Sunday morning interviews the economy is going 'gangbusters' and the state of the economy was actually flaunted by republicans prior to elections. i don't understand why the average Joe can't see where we're headed and demand these issues be addressed sooner rather than later? "

Bob wrote on Nov 14, 2006 9:13 AM:

" I agree with your sense of urgency. The geological imperativeness of the situation, and it's potential effects are staggering. Excellent article. I hope that the leaders in Washington will soon come clean, and spell out the plan (cause you know there is one) to the people. Of course this will most likely not happen, and civil unrest will ensue..famine due to a lack of fuel for delivery trucks..disease due to unsanitary conditions..armed conflict for the remaining food and resources..I agree with Mr. Hirsch in his report to the DOD that we need to implement timely mitigation options to avoid drastic economic hardships. I wish I could belive this inevitable event was higher up on the agenda than perverts in Congress, and reelection campaigns. Thank you for your attempt to get the word out...hold tight...PEACE. "

JeffreyET wrote on Nov 14, 2006 9:45 AM:

" We need more declarations like this. Politicians are not stupid, they just think they can keep their subjects - uh, I mean constituents in the dark until the game is over & they have all bugged out to Paraguay. It is up to us to make them understand that we know they are not stupid, but neither are we. "

tory wrote on Nov 14, 2006 10:20 AM:

" This guy should run for president "

Brian wrote on Nov 14, 2006 3:26 PM:

" Oil being traded in dollars is meaningless. They have things called currency markets where buyers without dollars can buy them to buy oil if they want. The oil countries then can recycle these dollars into Euros, yen, gold or anything else they want. The currency the good is denominated in is meaningless. The countries stockpiling dollar investments are holding far more dollars than they need to buy oil. And what did they do before the US had such a huge trade deficit? The US "dominating" world trade? Huh? We have a trade deficit of 800 billion dollars. Yeah, we're doing great. I think Bush and co. wanted to keep the oil revenues out of Saddam Hussein's hands. But "control of the oilfields"? Right now the US doesn't "control them", the Iraqi gov't gets oil revenues. And the oil is sold (2% of world output is from Iraq, that's it) to the same cast of companies that bought it before. It doesn't make sense. Oil is $1.50 a gallon. It would have been alot cheaper to simply buy the oil and store it than spend a trillion dollars to "secure it". Whatever that means. "

jim wrote on Nov 14, 2006 5:43 PM:

" Brian- The US did not have a trade deficit until the dollar became the only accepted currency for OPEC oil payments. It was then the Fed started to print money as they wished knowing it was backed by the most valuable commodity known to man. This problem becomes greater when those nations holding most of our debt have only two reasons to have an excess of dollars: To recycle the money through OPEC or lend it back to us to finance expenditures we can't afford. Sure it would have been alot cheaper to simply buy the oil and store it than spend a trillion dollars to "secure it" but not if we were China, who we owe 3 trillion dollars. I have written that the Chinese are responsible for us being over there to insure their investment in our debt... Man, does this complicate things!!! "

Dave wrote on Nov 14, 2006 7:19 PM:

" Thought-provoking, article Jim. Let's say that a leader in Washington identified a main problem head on and wanted to solve it with honest communication and a viable plan of action. l seriously doubt, with all the set-in-stone bureaucracy in Washington, that any leader, Republican or Democrat, intelligent or otherwise, would be able to effect significant change. The bureaucracy in Washington and the webs Washington has woven around the globe are so thick that truly honest politicians quickly become caught like a fly in the web. With the web so finely spun, true and lasting solutions can only come from outside the socio-political arena. Can only come when true spiritual ideas take hold in the hearts of people, one humanoid at a time. "

Spanky wrote on Nov 16, 2006 8:52 AM:

" General Washington was also against voting rights for all but property owners, as were most of the founding fathers. As for Peak Oil... the sky has been falling since man figured out the difference between night and day... and there is plenty oil all over the world in many forms, well over 150 years within our shores. Remove the dependant politics and energy would half in real dollars within a decade.... the sky still falling. "

Jim Lydecker wrote on Nov 19, 2006 12:03 AM:

" Jim Lydecker answers Spanky - The most generous estimates is that we have a smidgen less than one trillion barrels left. That's thirty years at today's rate of consumption. Supplies will become increasing harder and more difficult to extract so the problems really begin long before we actually 'run out.' The problem with all other sources is their EROEI, an acronym for energy returned on energy invested. In other words, as soon as that number is a negative, it is no longer viable to produce. To produce 1 gallon of oil from oil shale takes the equivalent of 5 to get it. For coal to be 'cracked' for lighter distillates, the ration gets even worse. Now everyone's favorite: Hydrogen. To produce enough to replace 1/4 of the cars with fuel cells would necessitate the immediate building of 1000 nuclear reactors, something that would bankrupt us way before 1/5 were completed. And it gets worse. By the time the first 200 were built, we encounter Peak Uranium and countries would be fighting wars for it. And there is only enough platinum on the planet to build fuel cells to replace 1/4 of America's cars. Sure hydrogen can be produced with natural gas... but the process requires 4 times the amount of NG to get the same amount of energy back as hydrogen. Then there is the problem of hydrogen being the smallest molecule known to man. It can't be stored anywhere without it constantly leaking. Another problem: Building all these new cars consume so much oil that to replace the cars of old with hydrogen or hybrids will just hasten the demise. To produce enough ethanol to put in 1/3 of our cars, the Department of Energy said yesterday that we'd need to find 400-600 million acres to put under cultivation, way,way more than we physically have. And like producing new cars, agriculture takes so much oil that it, too, would hasten the demise. I can go on about other alternatives but won't because in the end, my good dude, there is only one answer for our comfortable civilization to continue on our finite planet we call home: Seriously reduce the population. In 1977 the government commissioned a study to find out the answer to the same problem and their chilling answer (after several hundred pages or very boring numbers crunching): The entire world's population will have to be reduced to 400-500 million. That is like lining up everyone on Earth in front of a wall and for every 100, 92.5 have to go haste la vista (bye – bye). Only 7 ½ of you get to live. An area of Napa would be reduced to no more than 7500 people. This is scary stuff made worse by the fact that we have decided to not talk about it but, instead, breed ourselves into extinction. If this is the path we choose to walk, we deserve what we get. I am writing a book about this and hopefully it will passionately motivate enough people before it is too late. "

Kevin wrote on Nov 19, 2006 9:48 PM:

" So Jim, what exactly is it that you are motivating people to do? Are you asking the 92.5 people to volunteer? "

Jim Lydecker wrote on Nov 22, 2006 3:07 AM:

" Kevin- No, but by bringing up the seriousness of our impending crisis's by backing them with fact, perhaps, and only perhaps, will we do something about it. One of favorite quotes is from Mathew Simmons: Crisis’s are problems that went ignored. Simmons, who owns the world’s largest oil investment bank (Simmons International, Houston) and chaired Cheney’s infamous energy meeting (2001), is now screaming the loudest about our population overshooting earth’s carrying capacity and Peak Oil. Years ago he said we’d be dead in the water if we did not see these events until they appeared in the rear view mirror and he now believes this has come to pass. Knowing Simmons has the ear of Bush, Cheney and others in great power, you know they are aware of this as well and, for whatever reasons, have chosen to keep us in the dark. In a Register essay of perhaps two years ago, I said we want to believe that everyone walking a Washington DC corridor is an idiot but this is not the case. Those at the top and those who design and implement policy know everything we know, and much more. It is also up to those in leadership to take us down paths, regardless how painful, if circumstances require it. And since they have decided not to, then it is up to us who know to attempt to educate the masses before they are blindsided by a wall of reality of the worse kind. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy