NVR Logo
Does Copple case merit death penalty?
Sunday, November 12, 2006
Save and Share Share
It's been more than two years since two Napa women were stabbed to death in the upstairs bedrooms of a west Napa home, and the court case against accused murderer Eric Copple is beginning to heat up.

The brutal stabbings of Adriane Insogna and Leslie Mazzara, both 26, in the early morning hours of Nov. 1, 2004, shocked and frightened Napa Valley residents. It took nearly a year, and a nationwide search for clues, before police made an arrest. On the night of Sept. 28, 2005, Eric Matthew Copple, 26, of Napa, accompanied by members of his family, turned himself into the Napa Police Department. Police say he confessed to killing the two women in their home on the 2600 block of Dorset Street.
Copple was arrested booked into the Napa County jail charged with two counts of murder and special allegations of use of a deadly weapon and multiple victims. He pleaded not guilty in October 2005.

Copple is scheduled to appear in court on Wednesday. At that time the Napa County District Attorney's Office may announce if prosecutors will seek the death penalty against Copple. If they do, they will have to prove at trial not only that Copple is guilty of murder, but that the crime involved a special circumstance -- in this case double murder or lying in wait for his victims -- that would qualify the crime for capital punishment.
If prosecutors were to seek the death penalty against Copple and prevail, he would be the only Napa County inmate assigned to California's death row. However, there have been cases where Napa prosecutors have sought the death penalty (see sidebar, "Napa's history with capital crimes," below).

Police say Copple waited outside the home for hours before entering, going upstairs, and killing the two women.
The motive for the double slayings has not been made public. Copple is the husband of Lily Prudhomme Copple, who was close friends with Insogna.

Lily Copple is employed at the Napa Sanitation District, where Insogna worked as an civil engineer.

Insogna's mother, Calistoga resident Arleen Allen, said her daughter also was friends with Eric Copple.

Although the case remained stagnant for almost a year, detectives actively pursued leads, tested the DNA of people known to the victims and conducted interviews. The break in the investigation came in late September 2005, when Napa police released new DNA findings.

DNA samples found on Camel Turkish Gold cigarettes matched that of blood found at the scene of the murder. Copple smoked that brand of cigarettes. Investigators said they believed Copple read or heard about the DNA findings, believed that police were closing in on him and turned himself in.

After he was arrested, detectives took a sample of Copple's DNA, which apparently matched the DNA found on the cigarette butts.

Mark Boessenecker, Napa County chief deputy district attorney, and deputy district attorney Rob Wade are prosecuting the case. Both have experience in murder cases. Boessenecker tried many such cases before shifting from the San Mateo County District Attorney's office to Napa. Wade wrapped up his most recent murder trial just weeks ago, earning a first-degree murder conviction against Napa dentist Michael Posey.

Copple is being represented by Napa County Public Defender Greg Galeste and Vallejo attorney Amy Morton.
12 comment(s)

Nancy wrote on Nov 12, 2006 6:55 AM:

" He knew what he was doing. If it were my daughter I would want him to die. "

Dumb Question wrote on Nov 12, 2006 8:27 AM:

" Please don't ask me that. Of course YES would be the answer. That guy is sick and wrong. Jurors do the right thing. "

Confussed wrote on Nov 12, 2006 8:56 AM:

" I have one question. Why do we have to have a jury trial when he already admitted that he did it? "

Not to nick pick but.... wrote on Nov 13, 2006 11:03 AM:

" I am tiered of reading that Eric Copple's DNA matched that of the cigarette butt found at the scene. Let's be more clear about this. Yes his DNA matches the cigarette butt found at the scene. That means that his DNA also matches the blood found at the scene. Why is a simple detail, that can carry so much impact, only being implied in this article? "

Sickened.... wrote on Nov 14, 2006 2:18 PM:

" I am heart broken that someone could do such a horrible horrible act to two wonderful and talented ladies. I only pray that justice is served... Don't even believe for one minute that he didn't know what he was doing, no insanity plead should be granted. "

Saddened Friend wrote on Nov 15, 2006 12:58 PM:

" Mr. Copple already confessed to this heinous crime, even turned himself in. He was a man jealous of the friendship between his then fiancee and my friend Adriane, and desperate enough to get away with his hatred that when Leslie came to her defense, she was also eliminated. Emotions aside, personal feelings on the death penalty aside, the requirements for the "special circumstances" in which to consider the Death Penalty are certainly there. According to our state laws, this crime is perfectly outlined within the "death penalty" requirements. "

Ron wrote on Nov 15, 2006 5:03 PM:

" He has confessed and there was dna evidence. Personally, I am against the death penalty, for several reasons: (1)Life in prison without the possibilty of parol costs less and basically renders the perp a non threat, (2)it gives the the perp an opportunity to reflect on his corrupt soul and possibly make spiritual changes and commitments that will allow him a better life in the hereafter, (3)on more than a few cases it is discovered that an innocent party has been convicted, sometimes after they have been put to death, and (4)not all, but many of our own politicians, lawyers, judges, officers of the law and jurists have proven to be corrupt, therefore I don't believe they (any of them) should have the right to make the case for death. We are one of the few civilized nations that have the death penalty. I admit that it would be hard not to want revenge on someone like Richard Allen Davis, especially if you were family of Polly, but how is it more effective than life in prison? Some of the other civilized nations without the death penalty have less crime than we do, so how is it any more of a deterant? Copple will deserve whatever judment he receives, to that there is no doubt. It would be benificial if our prison systems were more of a deterant than they are (make the inmates work hard, cut off television and games. their medical should be bare minimum, and so on). "

Mad wrote on Nov 15, 2006 7:21 PM:

" Death or not, it is still going to cost us money. It makes no sense at all that a guy confesses and there is evidence, but we still need to have a trial. No wonder we are in debt. "

No free ride wrote on Nov 15, 2006 9:15 PM:

" The death penalty should only be taken off of the table, if he pleads guilty, and agrees to life in prison without the possibility of parole. That would save the families the trauma of a trial, the taxpayers the cost also. But this should only be done if both the Insogna, and Mazzara families agree this is what they want to happen. "

i agree, dumb question wrote on Nov 17, 2006 4:48 PM:

" He brutally murdered 2 talented YOUNG women who had their entire lives ahead of them, Heck YES he deserves the death penalty!! "

Execution wrote on Nov 18, 2006 12:06 PM:

" The Victims parents should decide not this group of hang’em high cowboys. "

To Eric's Family wrote on Nov 20, 2006 9:40 AM:

" I just wanted you to know that my heart truly goes out to you. I know you did not raise a monster. I know that you raised your child to love not hate. I just wanted to be one little bright spot in your day if you are reading this. Obviously my heart goes out to the victims and their families, but I wanted Eric's family to know that we are praying for you and your family. This is an unimaginable travesty for all. "

Comment guidelines
All comments will be screened and may take several hours to be posted.
• Keep comments clear, concise and focused on the topic in the story.
• Comments exceeding 300 words will not be posted.
• Refrain from personal attacks, degrading comments or remarks that do not add to a constructive dialogue.
• Comments implying suspects in crime-related stories are guilty before they have been proven so in a court of law will be deleted.
• Do not post e-mail addresses or links except for pages on Napavalleyregister.com or government Web sites.
• Comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined.
• Comments may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.
• If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact dross@napanews.com or bkennedy@napanews.com
For further information on the comment guidelines, click here.
Search:
Advanced searchWeb Search Powered By Yahoo! Search
Copyright © 2008 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy