NVR Logo
Time is now for Napa parks
Sunday, October 22, 2006
Save and Share Share
Dear editor,

This November, when I cast my yes vote for Measure I, Parks and Open Space, I will be 79 years old. I will have waited more than 30 years for a Board of Supervisors to pay attention to people's needs for outdoor recreation.
When I came on to the board in 1973, we managed to accept the care of a bicycle rest area on Solano Avenue, apply for and use a grant to improve a boat launch on the Napa River, and persuade the state to lease the Skyline Park lands to us. We also laid the groundwork for a County Parks Department.

That's all, folks! The rest has been silence.
Finally in 2000, a board put a parks district on the ballot, asking for it to be paid for by an increase in the hotel tax. One supervisor opposed it because it would not be under his control. Even so, 63.7 percent of the voters voted "yes." Since it was for special purposes, it needed 66.67 percent, so it "lost."

Again, in 2004, a board put the hotel tax on a ballot. Although parks were mentioned in the tax issue, every board member supported it because the money could be used for their pet uses (in the form of a general tax needing only 50 percent), and 57 percent of the voters said yes.
Now we have the opportunity to use the money from the hotel tax to create a Parks and Open Space District. No tax increase is included.

We can succeed with that funding. There will be real focus on what is needed and possible. There will be grants and private gifts available. True, the new directors will have to be nimble, and find cooperative ways to work with schools cities, and others.

But to allow a disgruntled minority to prevent us from those little successes must not happen. We must vote yes.

I note that there is again a supervisor against it because he can't run it. In a recent interview, some opponents said they are against it because it has no tax! What will the nay-sayers think of next?

Remember, we have voted for this twice!

If Napans ever in their lifetimes want access to the beautiful streams and hillsides that surround us, the time is now. We must not be sent wandering in the desert for another 40 years.

We know that some political leaders will always try to ignore or to frustrate our votes. But this time, let's make it stick. Let us all cast a firm and resounding yes vote on Measure I.

Ginny Simms

Napa
4 comment(s)

Shawna wrote on Oct 22, 2006 8:42 AM:

" I would like to see a skateboard ramp/park area as a part of this space. These kids need a place to get exercise. Not were we would have homeless people hanging around all day. We need a safe place. My family and I went to Hawaii over the summer. You would not believe the skate park they have. It is giant, the entire thing is made out of wood, with a bowl, ramps, grind areas, etc. An 80 year old local woman in Hawaii demanded and fought for these kids to have this space. Many people did not agree, but It was the best thing they could have made. They always have a parent hanging around to make sure no losers are just hanging around. People bring their recycle to the location and all of the money from that will go to any repairs that need to be made. The entire skate park is made out of wood and was build by donation from some local contractors. What a great idea. "

Not About Parks wrote on Oct 22, 2006 10:12 AM:

" Ginny Simms is a long time no growth activist who could care less about parks. She and her group want to get control of the hillsides and they don't want you walking around on their protected land. The Sierra Club has less than 1400 members and only 103 of them cared enough to vote in their last election of officers. They spend a lot of money to hire election consultants to make us think they represent our interests.Remember who spent the 1990s suing or threatening to sue Napa County? Yeah, the Sierra Club.Vote No On measure I "

open space for all wrote on Oct 23, 2006 9:01 AM:

" Opponents of Measure I are tying to defeat it by linking it to the Sierra Club. They ignore the fact that a county committee, whose members were mostly appointed by the supervisors, worked for more than two years on the parks issue. That committee concluded that we need a parks and open space district. A majority of the supervisors agreed. We all need open space, whether we belong to the Sierra Club or not. "

Just the Facts wrote on Oct 26, 2006 11:11 AM:

" For those of you who want to believe the Yes on I claims that the Citizens Advisory Committee is a well-rounded, unbiased, diverse group of concerned Napa Citizens, here are the facts: Two Open Space Committee Members are employees of the Land Trust of Napa County. Four Committee Members are employees of public Parks Agencies. Three Committee Members are current or former members of the Board of Directors of the Friends of the River. One Committee Member is Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Redwood Chapter of the Sierra Club. One Committee Member is the President of the Napa-Solano Audubon Society. More than two-thirds of the Committee Members are members of the Land Trust of Napa County or the Sierra Club, or both. I respect all of those organizations and the folks who support them. However, it is more accurate to say that the majority of the Open Space Advisory Committee cares about a single issue, than that it is a diverse group that cares about the good of the entire community. Speaking of single issue, I find it ironic that Ms. Simms, who has dedicated her life to preventing any change in Napa County from how it existed 79 years ago, is now complaining about the "disgruntled minority!" "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy