NVR Logo
Napa case spurs new law on adoptions
Tuesday, October 03, 2006
Save and Share Share
Cheryl and Mike Blair thought they would be proud parents when they signed a $15,000 contract to adopt children through Napa adoption facilitator Yunona USA.

The Connecticut couple later learned the children whose pictures they had cherished, whose futures they had in mind when decorating their new bedrooms, had never been available for adoption. The Milfords didn’t get their money back, but that was the least of their worries.
“I’ve described this as what it must have felt like to parents — waiting nine months only to have their child stillborn and having to mourn instead of celebrate,” Mike Blair said after learning he had been scammed.

California adoption facilitators like the now-defunct Yunona USA will have a harder time fooling would-be adoptive parents like the Milfords, now that a bill inspired by coverage of Yunona USA is slated to become law in January.
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed SB 1758 late Friday, which will require adoption facilitators in the state — middlemen in the adoption process — to post a $25,000 bond, undergo social work training and register with the state. The bill also paves the way for the state to conduct criminal background checks on adoption facilitators.

Previously, facilitators only had to post a $10,000 bond to set up shop legally.
State Sen. Liz Figueroa, D-Fremont, the author of the bill, said she decided to investigate regulation of the adoption facilitator industry after reading the Napa Valley Register’s coverage of the Yunona USA investigation.

Legal loopholes at the state, federal and international level allowed adoption facilitators such as Yunona USA — later revealed by police to have scammed more than a hundred families across the country — to operate with no oversight.

Hearings at the state capitol, where Napa police investigators and adoption industry officials testified, led to SB 1758.

In his signing message, Schwarzenegger lauded Figueroa’s bill.

“Senate Bill 1758 will increase accountability for adoption facilitators in California and better protect children and families by increasing surety bonds, creating an online registry of adoption facilitators who meet specific requirements, and authorizing the Department of Social Services to conduct criminal background checks for these individuals,” he said.

Figueroa said she was surprised by support for some adoption facilitators at hearings held in Sacramento.

“Surprisingly enough, we thought people would say we should exclude facilitators,” she said. “Why not ban them altogether? But we found that people wanted regulation.”

Napa County prosecutors won a $368,000 default civil judgment in July against Yunona USA president Ivan Jerdev, who they alleged in court papers scammed more than $1.1 million from more than 100 would-be adoptive parents.

 Jerdev is thought to be in Russia, where Russian newspapers reported earlier this year that he faced charges of child trafficking and release of confidential information.

Yunona’s Napa offices on Jefferson Street were shut down shortly after police raided the business in late December, carrying away company files and computers.

Schwarzenegger indicated in his signing message that next legislative session would see further steps taken to regulate adoption facilitators.

“While this bill is a good start to improve adoption facilitator services in California, I am directing the Department of Social Services to work with the Department of Justice and the Legislature on legislation next year to ensure the background checks provisions of the bill are technically improved and provide clear standards to expedite implementation,” he said.
3 comment(s)

Cory Barron wrote on Oct 3, 2006 9:53 AM:

" International adoption for a family is a huge emotional and financial process. Please interview several agencies, as well as their references, and require of them COA and ECFA accreditation before you apply. Also never, pay large sums of money up front. As a non-profit 501(C)(3), Children's Hope International does not require fees until service is rendered. The bulk of the fees come toward the tail-end of the process. There are many fine reputable non-profit agencies like CHI that can help you bring a child into your family. So don't be afraid, just do your homework, the Governor will not do that for you. "

Crystal Shetka wrote on Oct 7, 2006 6:55 AM:

" My husband and I were another couple who had been scammed through Yunona last December. We also lost all our money going into this adoption and also had a child picked out from Ukraine. It's very frustrating to go on with your life when all the money you put towards a child is gone and now we have nothing. I am hoping that there is a way of passing a law that when families are victimized such as this, that there would be a special tax write off of all the money that was basically stolen. I also don't understand how and why the previous employees of Yunona are starting other agencies in various states and posting the same children that were on Yunona’s website on there new adoption websites. The United States must find a way of stopping this in EVERY state, not just California. I would like to see some justice and so far I just feel let down once again. "

Leslie wrote on Nov 28, 2006 9:53 AM:

" Although our intended adoption finalized, I have learned that what Yunona did to us and our daughter was illegal. We are out thousands of dollars from an up-front "child on hold" fee, as well as post-placement serivices interrupted by their closure (which I just found out about yesterday). It makes me feel scammed, even though our adoption went through. And now, with our final post-placement report time coming up, I have nowhere to turn to. I wish someone would tell me who I need to contact regarding Yunona victims. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy