NVR Logo
A Napa Journal: Race matters
Sunday, September 24, 2006
Save and Share Share
November 23rd, 2008
November 16th, 2008
November 9th, 2008
November 2nd, 2008
October 26th, 2008
People have their news preferences. Some devour crime and smash-up stories, while others camp out in the sports section. I know a few who never get beyond the comics.

I'm a sucker for race stories, and I don't mean NASCAR. I'll read anything about how blacks and whites, whites and browns and all the other racial/ethnic combinations are getting along.
Are we sharing the same schools? Who's getting their fair share of the American dream and who's not? Are we coming together or moving apart?

My interest almost certainly goes back to 1960, when I moved from New Jersey to a small, segregated Alabama town roiled by the emerging civil rights movement.
Blacks went to a black school, whites to white. Drinking fountains carried "white only" and "Negro only" designations. The municipal swimming pool was only for the pale-complected.

I thought this was the strangest thing. It was as if the South had won the Civil War.
The adults around me, including my mother and my esteemed blood relations, not only accepted this Southern way of life, they quietly defended it. There was no end to their rationalizations.

I sympathized. The social changes being asked of whites were wrenching. But still, the status quo didn't pass historical muster. It was time for the South to join the rest of America.

I left Alabama with a new racial consciousness and an eye for inequality, which turned out to be everywhere, North and South.

I moved to Napa in 1973. One of the first things I noticed was that Napa didn't have black people.

Didn't then and hardly does now. The latest federal estimate puts the county's black population at 1.3 percent. In Napa, it's almost certainly less.

What does one make of 1.3 percent? Such a freakishly low percentage, especially for a community at the edge of the intensely multi-racial Bay Area?

There are many possible explanations, ranging from common patterns of association to outright bigotry. Perhaps the best accounting is lost to history.

All I know is that the longer I've lived here, the less I've questioned Napa's lack of a significant black population. This community's surging Latino community seems a more relevant demographic issue.

Last weekend I went to the Napa Valley Opera House to hear Brian Copeland, a comic and Bay Area TV guy, do his one-man show, "Not a Genuine Black Man."

Copeland tells the story of his family -- black -- moving to San Leandro -- white -- in 1972. This was years after the Summer of Love. The Bay Area already had a national reputation for liberal fair-mindedness.

Such generalizations didn't apply to San Leandro, a 99.99 percent white town terrified of being overrun by the poor blacks of adjacent Oakland. Copeland's family had a fight on its hands.

Copeland recounted incidents of raw bigotry with hurt, anger and injections of humor that made it all bearable for his white audience. Our consciences were touched, and so were our funny bones.

I left the Opera House wondering about San Leandro, 1972. Were there any similarities with nearly-as-white Napa of the same period?

Napa didn't feel embattled when I moved here. Our identity as a white town was not being challenged. There were no overt signs that we had thrown up racial barricades.

I think most Napa residents of 1973 would have rejected the racist label. Perhaps our city just happens not to have black people, we would have said. There may have been historical reasons, but they had nothing to do with us.

I have subsequently learned of Ku Klux Klan rallies in the Napa Valley prior to World War II. An ugly bit of history, for sure, but those hooded bigots weren't us. We came decades later.

I do recall a neighbor who confided in me that he would never sell his house to a black person. His actual term of reference was much stronger, the kind of word you might have associated with Jim Crow Alabama.

He explained his racial bias in friendly terms. He would not sell to a black family out of consideration for me and his other white neighbor.

Well, here it was: the naked face of bigotry. No beating around the bush. No obfuscation. Just one neighbor sharing with another neighbor his desire that Napa remain always white.

My response was classic. I did not condemn my neighbor's racism. I did not say, "Don't worry about me, Charlie. I can handle living next to a black person."

I was silent.

Kevin can be reached at 256-2217 or Napa Valley Register, P.O. Box 150, Napa 94559 or kcourtney@napanews.com
3 comment(s)

Jarvis wrote on Sep 24, 2006 7:46 AM:

" That you remained mute seems to be the moral equivalent of being racist. As long as the good folk stay silent as the bad folk spout off, there will be never be progress made to incorporate all people into this sliver of land that we call paradise. White sheets are not required when you strive to set the tone of racism. Just follow any Black man around Napa and you will see how many people suddenly trigger their car alarms or grab the hands of their youth when he enters the area. Notice how the pathetic members of Napa law enforcement treat the Hispanics and Blacks in contrast to how they treat whites. Again, as long as the goods allow the bads to flourish, we all lose. Napa seems to be schizophrenic with regards to race which is as it is in most geographical areas. When racial bias is employed by those in authority, it must be attacked and excised for the public good. "

Atumn wrote on Sep 25, 2006 9:57 AM:

" Race defines America not merely Napa and its rosy apellations. The concept of a merry oasis of white people on the edge of urban sprawl has always been a myth. we live here to escape the problems of race and difference, imagining that we are some how better or blessed in our "paradise." "

to Jarvis wrote on Oct 11, 2006 1:19 AM:

" I don't think we should pay much attention to the likes of Jarvis here, who once wrote in the sentinel expressing his desire that there be more frequent, fatal attacks on Napa police officers. Be happy that we don't have the crime levels of Richmond, Oakland or Vallejo "

Comment guidelines
All comments will be screened and may take several hours to be posted.
• Keep comments clear, concise and focused on the topic in the story.
• Comments exceeding 300 words will not be posted.
• Refrain from personal attacks, degrading comments or remarks that do not add to a constructive dialogue.
• Comments implying suspects in crime-related stories are guilty before they have been proven so in a court of law will be deleted.
• Do not post e-mail addresses or links except for pages on Napavalleyregister.com or government Web sites.
• Comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined.
• Comments may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.
• If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact dross@napanews.com or bkennedy@napanews.com
For further information on the comment guidelines, click here.
Search:
Advanced searchWeb Search Powered By Yahoo! Search
Copyright © 2008 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy