NVR Logo
China's growing middle class saves less
Wednesday, May 03, 2006
Save and Share Share
SHANGHAI -- American policy makers often complain that the Chinese save too much. They should meet the Su family.

Su Yang, the co-owner of a Shanghai air-freight company, and his wife, Ren Jie, a human-resources manager, earn nearly $50,000 a year. After paying the $375 monthly mortgage on their marble-floored townhouse and shelling out for two cars, food, school tuition and foreign travel, they save almost nothing.
"Life is short," says Mr. Su, sinking into one of the brown leather sofas arranged around his flat-screen Hitachi television. "We've got to live life for the moment."

The Sus are part of a growing consumer culture taking hold among China's burgeoning middle class. Enough young urban professionals are blowing their whole salary these days that the Chinese media have nicknamed them "yue guang zu," roughly translated as the "monthly tapped-out class," much to the astonishment of their parents. Savings rates, although still among the world's highest, are slipping.
Government officials in Beijing and Washington are encouraging the erosion of savings as a way of reducing China's massive trade imbalance with the U.S. Both sides hope China's citizens will dip into their savings to buy more -- including U.S. goods -- to counter the record trade deficit and an already-tense showdown over trade sanctions and currency adjustments. Many economists worry that the deficit is eroding America's job base as production shifts to China, and causing the U.S. to borrow too much from the rest of the world.

During his visit late last month to the U.S., Chinese President Hu Jintao told reporters that his country is banking on "domestic demand expansion" rather than a high trade surplus to promote growth. The White House lauded China's commitment to lower its savings rate as a "big step." Last week, in a major policy shift, China's central bank raised banks' lending rates but left the maximum interest rate on deposits unchanged -- a further disincentive to savings.
But China's shift away from high savings isn't likely to relieve the imbalance of global trade anytime soon. Among the reasons: The Chinese are spending big portions of their savings domestically on basic necessities such as education, housing and health care. So many U.S. companies from General Motors Corp. to Procter & Gamble Co. are producing goods in China that increased sales often don't relieve the trade imbalance.

Average incomes in China are still so small that a shift from saving to spending will mean little in absolute dollar terms for most households. And there are also less household savings to tap into than many believe.

To be sure, China still saves a huge portion -- around 44 percent -- of its gross domestic product, compared with 14 percent in the U.S. Total national savings have even accelerated in recent years as China vaulted into position as the world's fourth-largest economy. China's bank accounts are bulging with deposits totaling around $3.75 trillion, more than double the figure in 2000. But the average account is tiny. China Construction Bank Corp., one of the country's largest, says more than half of its 325 million personal accounts held less than $13 at the end of 2005, and the average balance was just $730.

China's household-savings rate, about 16 percent of GDP, has slipped from its highs of more than 20 percent in the mid-1990s, according to a World Bank estimate. Corporate savings in China account for more than 22 percent, and are rising. The remainder is China's relatively consistent but unusually high level of government savings. (In addition to government savings, China's central bank sits on $875 billion in foreign-exchange reserves.)

"Traditionally, there was a perception that households in China do all the savings," says Louis Kuijs, a World Bank senior economist. "Household saving is significant in China, but it is not driving the national savings."

Boosting Chinese consumer activity is a primary focus of policy makers. Retail sales jumped 13 percent last year, outpacing the 9.9 percent GDP expansion. But even as middle-class families like Mr. Su's are saving less and spending more, their purchases haven't made much dent in China's trade surplus. The reason: Chinese consumer demand isn't matching the output of the nation's low-cost-export engine.

Also, a look at Mr. Su's shopping list shows that his family doesn't buy many imports, although some of its spending does find its way into American pockets.

Sales of U.S. brands are strong in China, but most of the products are actually made here, too, from GM's Buicks to the Safeguard soap and Head & Shoulders shampoo from Procter & Gamble on Mr. Su's shelves. China is among P&G's top five global markets but "we're fairly self-contained. We do not export a lot and don't import a lot," says Irwin Lee, P&G's vice president for Greater China. So while the 49,000 American companies operating in China may see the benefit of the country's rising consumerism on their bottom line, there is often little ripple in trade flows.

Neither the IBM laptop Mr. Su bought for $2,000 last year, nor his $100 Tommy Hilfiger shirts, were made in the U.S.

In a China outlet of Wal-Mart Stores Inc., U.S.-made consumer products are no easier to find than they are in a Wal-Mart located in the U.S. President Hu said during his U.S. trip that at least 90 percent of the products exported from China to the U.S. are no longer made in the U.S. "Actually it's hard to find real U.S.-imports," Mr. Su concludes.

Just a few products Mr. Su's family buys are genuine American origin, including steak sauce from Pittsburgh-based H.J. Heinz Co. and Carlo Rossi wine from Modesto, California-based E.&J. Gallo Winery. The family also buys oranges exported by Sunkist Growers Inc., based in Sherman Oaks, California.

Like many of the economic forces now reshaping China, savings are a relatively recent phenomenon. When economic overhauls began in the late 1970s, households had virtually no money at all. The government issued coupons to buy consumer products such as televisions and bicycles.

As China bumped its way toward a market economy without much of a social safety net from a planned system where the state took care of everything, the response of many citizens was defensive: Expand savings. Chinese with money had only one choice: in which bank to deposit it.

For urban residents like 33-year-old Mr. Su, economic progress moved at a breathless pace. His family's combined income of nearly $50,000, while not uncommon for the urban middle class, towers over the per-capita GDP average of $1,700. A decade ago, the lanky Mr. Su was the freight manager at a local airline, lived with hisapartment. Family members pitched in to cover the purchase price, even though banks in Shanghai had begun offering mortgages the previous year.

By 2003, Mr. Su's family bank balance had swelled to about $60,000. His two-year-old air-freight business was doing well and his wife had earned a promotion in her job. The future looked so bright, Mr. Su says, the couple decided to stop saving "at the expense of sacrificing our life quality."

That year, the couple agreed to pay about $180,000 for a townhouse, figuring the second-hand property far from the city center was a bargain. The purchase blew out their savings, even though they had since doubled their money on their first apartment. They took out a 25-year, $60,000 bank mortgage.

These days, temptations to borrow arrive often -- in the mailbox. At least three times in recent months, Mr. Su says he has received a credit card engraved with his name, including one from Citigroup Inc.'s affiliate.

New expenses also appear almost as fast the couple's earnings rise. Just last year, Mr. Su's 61-year-old father retired from his engineering job at a state-owned company, and his parents now live with his family. Ms. Ren also lends financial support to her parents.

The older folks sometimes drop hints: "You are very young. But you should remember you should save some money," Mr. Su quotes his parents saying. In fact, his mother says she has softened her views. "In the past we were concerned about saving too much," she says.

Before 2001, the couple hadn't set foot outside China. Once or twice a year these days, Mr. Su drops $6,000 taking everyone on a trip. Family photographs from Sweden, Mexico and the U.S. adorn a tabletop near the front door -- another reminder of how Chinese are distributing wealth around the world. Donald Duck posed with Mr. Su's family last November at Hong Kong Disneyland.

Fixed expenses that his parents never faced eat up the final quarter of Mr. Su's family budget, from the home mortgage to his 7-year-old daughter's private-school tuition to car payments. Under communism, the state provided Chinese with places to live and study -- and anyone with "wheels" had a bicycle. "Ten years ago we couldn't imagine we could have a house, a car," he says between calls on his cellphone.

Personal savings in China don't substantially exceed those in countries like France as a percentage of GDP and may be less than in some other nations, like India, according to World Bank figures. In India, by comparison, household savings are about 22 percent of GDP.

Savings are secondary to 31-year-old Jessica Xu, a university recruiter in Shanghai with a $25,000 annual income, four credit cards and a desire to "buy something just because it's beautiful." Her goal is to save, and she does. But memories are far more important, like treating her mother last year with a $6,250 trip to Southeast Asia.

When she feels family pressure to save money by buying lower-price clothes, Ms. Xu says she reminds herself "there are a lot of things I haven't done" and that dressing trendy is helpful in her job. "I waste a lot of money," Ms. Xu says.

Ellen Zhu contributed to this article.
No comments posted.
Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy