NVR Logo
Letter writer misrepresented Nemko
Tuesday, November 01, 2005
Save and Share Share
Dear editor,

In an Oct. 27 letter to the editor ("Nemko wrong on Prop. 73"), Francis Crotty reviews a meeting he attended of the Napa Valley Democrats in September, in which four of the propositions on the Nov. 8 ballot were discussed by speakers who had expertise in the areas the measures would affect. I attended that same meeting.
Mr. Crotty has a remarkably different memory of events of the meeting than I, and has used personal recall to castigate Napa County Office of Education Superintendent Barbara Nemko's views regarding "the open door policy for Planned Parenthood's aberrant activities."

"I believe the voters in Napa should be aware of Ms. Nemko's views regarding the open door policy for Planned Parenthood's aberrant activities. Barbara Nemko's liberal credentials and regrettable activities are not the kind I or most other voters would agree with," Crotty states.
Let me set the record straight. Barbara Nemko made a presentation at the meet on Propositions 74 (public school teachers waiting period) and Proposition 76 (state spending and school funding limits). At no time did she ever once discuss or offer an opinion on Proposition 73.

I do not know what "regrettable activities" Crotty believes the superintendent of schools has engaged in. I do remember that Heather Howell, the speaker for 73 sitting next to Dr. Nemko, did say something to the effect in her presentation that before abortion became legal, there was a time in our history when young women went through some terrible, life-threatening and indeed deadly procedures to obtain an abortion. Both Dr. Nemko and myself, being old enough to have lived through that period in our history, nodded our heads.
Crotty has every right to uphold his views on Proposition 73 and vigorously present his point of view. But what he has no right whatsoever to do is misrepresent someone else's view or attitude based on the mere nod of one's head. It is very misleading that he has written a letter leading anyone who was not in attendance to assume that Dr. Nemko discussed any issues regarding Proposition 73. This has an all too familiar smack of a kind of smear tactics used in the discredited 1950s McCarthy era.

Sybil Hinkle

Napa
No comments posted.
Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy