NVR Logo
21 lucky locals get to help plan county's future
Wednesday, June 29, 2005
Save and Share Share
The Napa County Board of Supervisors' chambers were filled with hopeful residents Tuesday morning, people who had come to join a highly political process.

Board members were poised to pick 21 people to sit on a steering committee that will guide the development of the county's revised general plan, the blueprint for the future of Napa County.
"This is really an important matter," said Board Chair Diane Dillon. "There's been a lot of public attention."

Eighty-eight residents with diverse backgrounds, representing nearly all geographic corners of the county, submitted applications, although two dropped out at the eleventh hour.
Both applicants asking to be taken out of the running are professional planners, former county planning director Jim Hickey and St. Helena consultant Donna Oldford.

Board members proceeded to pick representatives one at a time, alternating first by supervisorial district, then reversing the order, then in alphabetical order until each of the five supervisors had picked four committee members from the lengthy list.
The first to be formally approved for the steering committee was Carol Poole, St. Helena's planning director, who was tapped by county CEO Nancy Watt in collaboration with the city managers of the county.

Supervisor Harold Moskowite voted against Poole saying, "I don't think she's the one to represent the cities."

The makeup of the remainder of the steering committee as picked by each supervisor includes:

* Brad Wagenknecht (Dist. 1): Mary Ellen Boyet, Jon-Mark Chappellet, Beth Painter and Jeff Reichel.

* Mark Luce (Dist. 2): Carole Meredith, Michael Haley, George Bachich and Debra Blodgett.

* Diane Dillon (Dist. 3): Guy Kay, Tom Gamble, Peter McCrea and Carol Kunze.

* Bill Dodd (Dist. 4): Conrad Hewitt, Jim Hendrickson, Tom Andrews and Robert Torres.

* Harold Moskowite (Dist. 5): Brad Simpkins, Stephen Cuddy, Stuart Smith and Duane Wall.

The committee will meet at least monthly, perhaps for the next two to three years. "I hope we can convince 62 unhappy people to remain a part of the process," said Hillary Gitelman, the county's planning director who is coordinating the overall general plan effort. "We look forward to working with this group."

Community Partnership Manager Howard Siegel said the first meeting will be held July 27. It will be an organizational session for members to meet one another and to pick officers.

The August session will begin the nuts-and-bolts part of the job with a detailed presentation of the county's work to date on a Baseline Data Report. The report contains technical information on a variety of topics ranging from geology and hydrology to fire ecology and public facilities.

Napa County has budgeted $1 million this year for the general plan process. Earlier this year, a series of seven meetings was held around the county to lay the groundwork for the plan's development.

The last general plan update was completed in 1983. The revision could be concluded as early as mid-2007.
1 comment(s)

ruby wrote on Jan 30, 2007 8:32 AM:

" I am reading this article in 2007 - too late for my comments to make any difference in the outcome of this. However,Napa County is one of the most unique places in our country - creating outstanding wines in an agricultural setting. I believe slow growth policies are the only procedures that can preserve the vestiges of what Napa County had and could be. Please do not become interested in nothing but development's special interests and unbridaled fast growth and lose one of the lovliest areas and high quality wines just to make more dollars. Do not cave into the desires of those who feel entitled and/or who do not care about the preservation of this place. Without strong direction from those who run the County's affairs, all that makes this area so valuable, the area, as we know it, WILL disappear. Even in 2007 it is not too late to make preservation of this place your #1 goal. Preserved lands become more valuable and your towns and agricultural areas can keep this area financially and environmentally successful. Have firm goals, be tough, be professional, work together and be patient. It is not too late. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy